Runboard.com
You're welcome.

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2  3 ... 7  8  9  10  11  12  13 

 
CooterBrown44 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 01-2017
Posts: 361
Karma: 2 (+2/-0)
Reply | Quote
Senate to vote on Rand Paul's war proposal.


quote:

The Senate will weigh in on Sen. Rand Paul's push to sunset two war authorizations, a vote that follows the Kentucky Republican's threat to grind an annual defense bill to a standstill.

Senators will hold a vote on Paul's amendment to sunset the 2001 and 2002 Authorizations for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) on Wednesday.

Paul wants to attach a six-month sunset of the two war bills to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The 2001 AUMF passed in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, while the 2002 AUMF authorized the Iraq War.

The move comes after Paul said on Monday that he would slow-walk the Senate's consideration of the NDAA — an annual bill that normally passes with large, bipartisan margins — and block any other of the hundreds of amendments from getting votes.

Paul's amendment is unlikely to get added to the Senate's defense bill.

Senators on both sides of the aisle have been pushing for years for Congress to hold a vote on if they should sunset the 2001 or 2002 war authorizations, or pass a new AUMF to fight the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

But deep policy and political divisions have repeatedly stymied congressional efforts.

However, Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), one of the Senate's most vocal proponents of a new war authorization, said on Tuesday that he would support Paul's push.

"I am supporting Senator Paul's amendment. I think it is way past time—way past time—for Congress to take this up and for everybody to be on the record. I think our allies need to know whether Congress supports the American military missions currently under way," Kaine said.

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) is also expected to support it.



]Source.

It's past time that the Congress asserted it's constitutional authority concerning the use of our military by Presidents who will go off playing "whack a mole" when it suits their desires or they need some political warm and fuzzies.
9/12/2017, 6:52 pm Link to this post PM CooterBrown44
 
bricklayer Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 08-2017
Posts: 211
Karma: 4 (+4/-0)
Reply | Quote
Re: Senate to vote on Rand Paul's war proposal.


I couldn't agree more, Cooter.
9/12/2017, 7:02 pm Link to this post PM bricklayer
 
CooterBrown44 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 01-2017
Posts: 361
Karma: 2 (+2/-0)
Reply | Quote
Liberals in a tizzy over statues.


quote:

Many blacks and their white liberal allies demand the removal of statues of Confederate generals and the Confederate battle flag, and they are working up steam to destroy the images of Gens. Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee and President Jefferson Davis from Stone Mountain in Georgia. Allow me to speculate as to the whys of this statue removal craze, which we might call statucide.

To understand it, we need a review of the promises black and white liberals have been making for decades. In 1940, the black poverty rate was 87 percent. By 1960, it had fallen to 47 percent. During that interval, blacks were politically impotent. There were no anti-poverty programs or affirmative action programs. Nonetheless, this poverty reduction exceeded that in any other 20-year interval. But the black leadership argued that more was necessary. They said that broad advancement could not be made unless blacks gained political power.

Fifty years ago, there were fewer than 1,000 black elected officials nationwide. According to the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, by 2011 there were roughly 10,500 black elected officials, not to mention a black president. But what were the fruits of greater political power?

The greatest black poverty, poorest education, highest crime rates and greatest family instability are in cities such as Detroit, St. Louis, Oakland, Memphis, Birmingham, Atlanta, Baltimore, Cleveland, Philadelphia and Buffalo. The most common characteristic of these predominantly black cities is that for decades, all of them have been run by Democratic and presumably liberal politicians. Plus, in most cases, blacks have been mayors, chiefs of police, school superintendents and principals and have dominated city councils.

During the 1960s, black and white liberals called for more money to be spent on anti-poverty programs. Since the Lyndon Johnson administration's War on Poverty programs, U.S. taxpayers have forked over $22 trillion for anti-poverty programs. Adjusted for inflation, that's three times the cost of all U.S. military wars since the American Revolution.

Despite that spending, the socio-economic condition for many blacks has worsened. In 1940, 86 percent of black children were born inside marriage, and the black illegitimacy rate was about 15 percent. Today, only 35 percent of black children are born inside marriage, and the illegitimacy rate hovers around 75 percent.

The visions of black civil rights leaders and their white liberal allies didn't quite pan out. Greater political power and massive anti-poverty spending produced little. The failure of political power and the failure of massive welfare spending to produce nirvana led to the expectation that if only there were a black president, everything would become better for blacks.

I cannot think of a single black socio-economic statistic that improved during the two terms of the Barack Obama administration. Some have become tragically worse, such as the black homicide victimization rate. For example, on average in Chicago, one person is shot every two hours, 15 minutes, and a person is murdered every 12 1/2 hours.

So more political power hasn't worked.
Massive poverty spending hasn't worked.
Electing a black president hasn't worked.
What should black leaders and their white liberal allies now turn their attention to in order to improve the socio-economic condition for blacks?

It appears to be nearly unanimous that attention should be turned to the removal of Confederate statues. It's not only Confederate statue removal but Confederate names of schools and streets. Even the Council on American-Islamic Relations agrees. It just passed a resolution calling for the removal of all Confederate memorials, flags, street names and symbols from public spaces and property.

By the way, does the statue of Union Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman qualify for removal? He once explained his reluctance to enlist former slaves, writing, "I am honest in my belief that it is not fair to our men to count negroes as equals ... (but) is not a negro as good as a white man to stop a bullet?" It's difficult to determine where this purging of the nation's history should end.



Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University.

]Source.

This was in my state newspaper, but for some reason or another I wasn't about to get it online. Fortunately it was in a lot of other places.

My "theory" is that improving not only race relations but the economic status of the general population is up to each of us as individuals. Passing laws has done little if anything. Treating each other as we would like to have them treat us would solve a lot of problems.
9/12/2017, 8:25 pm Link to this post PM CooterBrown44
 
Miz Robbie Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Head Administrator
Global user

Registered: 08-2017
Posts: 542
Karma: 2 (+2/-0)
Reply | Quote
Re: Quickies


Human beings seem hardwired to have an us and a them, and if those divisions aren't immediately obvious we'll create them.

A Jewish joke says that if there were only two Jews in the world we'd need three synagogues: one for you, one for me, and one for both of us to boycott.

We seem to congregate in packs.

---
Robbie
9/12/2017, 10:01 pm Link to this post PM Miz Robbie
 
CooterBrown44 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 01-2017
Posts: 361
Karma: 2 (+2/-0)
Reply | Quote
Re: Quickies


There has been some needed legislation passed. Civil Rights Act of '64 and the Voting Rights Act of '65. Unfortunately GOP state governments have been trying to legalize voter suppression.
9/13/2017, 1:06 am Link to this post PM CooterBrown44
 
Bellelettres Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 11-2008
Posts: 373
Karma: -1 (+1/-2)
Reply | Quote
Re: Quickies


I wonder how reliable Williams's figures are. For instance, he says, "In 1940, 86 percent of black children were born inside marriage, and the black illegitimacy rate was about 15 percent. Today, only 35 percent of black children are born inside marriage, and the illegitimacy rate hovers around 75 percent." 86 and 15 are pretty close to 100 percent, but if 35 percent of black children are born inside marriage, how can around 75 percent of them be illegitimate?

I'll address voter suppression in the next post.
9/13/2017, 6:23 am Link to this post PM Bellelettres
 
Bellelettres Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 11-2008
Posts: 373
Karma: -1 (+1/-2)
Reply | Quote
Re: Quickies


Gorsuch bodes ill.

Over liberals’ objections, Supreme Court says Texas need not draw new districts now

By Robert Barnes September 12 at 9:49 PM

Over the objections of four liberal justices, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday night that Texas does not immediately have to redraw electoral districts that a lower court found diminished the influence of minority voters.

The 5-to-4 ruling almost surely means the 2018 midterm elections will be conducted in the disputed congressional and legislative districts.

The justices gave no reasons in their one-paragraph statement granting a request from Texas that it not be forced to draw new districts until the Supreme Court reviewed the lower court’s decision.

But the court’s liberals — Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan — signaled their unhappiness by noting they would not have agreed to Texas’s request.

The court’s intervention was a victory for Texas Republicans, who had drawn the districts. It disappointed civil rights groups, who had noted that even though growth in the state’s Hispanic population was the reason for additional congressional seats, none were drawn to favor minority candidates.

The decision was yet another indication of the influence of President Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court, Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, who joined the court in April. Without a full complement of five conservative justices, the court likely would have tied 4 to 4, and Texas’s request for a stay would have failed.

The state has been in the midst of an extraordinary losing streak in federal courts over the way it conducts elections.

Over the latter part of the summer, federal judges in four separate cases ruled that the Texas Legislature discriminated against minorities in drawing congressional and legislative districts, setting ID requirements for voters and even regulating who can assist voters whose first language is not English.

Two courts are considering whether the actions were intended to discourage African American and Hispanic voters. If the courts find that the efforts were intentional, it could return Texas to the kind of federal oversight from which the Supreme Court freed it and other mostly Southern states in the
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) called the rulings “outrageous” and “astonishing.”

A lower court overseeing the redistricting cases called for a special session of the Texas Legislature to redraw the electoral lines. But Paxton went quickly to the Supreme Court, saying it would be a waste of time if the Supreme Court ultimately agreed with Texas that the districts did not have to be redrawn.

The decision by a three-judge panel ordering new districts “is not just wrong, but egregiously so,” Paxton told the court in a brief.

Without a special session or a court redrawing the legislative and congressional district lines, it would seem impossible to have the new districts in place in time for the 2018 elections. Redrawn districts probably would have increased the chances for Democrats and minorities to capture them.

[sign in to see URL]
 
9/13/2017, 6:25 am Link to this post PM Bellelettres
 
CooterBrown44 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 01-2017
Posts: 361
Karma: 2 (+2/-0)
Reply | Quote
Re: Quickies


"Diminished the influence of minority voters". That reminds me of their "not being able to elect a candidate of their choice".

I know that Texas has and will gerrymander districts to ensure GOP majorities so that the white folks can run things to their satisfaction. I've just always felt that there were better language that the attorneys and politicians could have used.

I also don't find Sotomayer to be that liberal. Neither is Breyer, necessarily. The other two are.

This actually seems to me that the court is going to let things stay until they have a chance to review the case. It's no hint on how they might rule, and with Roberts, anything is possible.
9/13/2017, 11:43 am Link to this post PM CooterBrown44
 
CooterBrown44 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 01-2017
Posts: 361
Karma: 2 (+2/-0)
Reply | Quote
Ryan: Deporting Dreamers 'not in our nation's interest'.


This Congress has a lot of people confused. LOL!!

quote:

Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said deporting recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA) was “not in our nation’s interest” and believes Congress could reach a legislative fix.

"I do believe that kicking these 800,000 kids out to countries that they have probably not been to since they were toddlers, countries that speak languages that they may not even know, is not in our nation's interest," Ryan said in a wide-ranging AP Newsmakers interview Wednesday.

Ryan discussed immigration at length. But while he declined to discuss details of a deal, he hinted a fix with border security measures could get through Congress.

"I don't want to negotiate through the media," he added.

Ryan is meeting this afternoon with House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) and the leaders of the Hispanic, Black and Asian American and Pacific Islander Caucuses to discuss DACA.

The Obama-era program provides relief for immigrants brought to the country illegally as children.

President Trump rescinded the program last week, but gave Congress six months to figure out a legislative solution for 690,000 undocumented immigrants who could soon lose their work permits and deferral from deportation.

Ryan said Trump "made the right call" in giving Congress a six-month deadline to find a solution.

"I wanted him to give us time, I didn't want it to be rescinded on day one and create chaos. But he was right in that President Obama was wrong in basically using legislative powers that he did not possess," said Ryan.

"What we asked the White House is to give us some time, so we could come up with the right consensus and compromise to fix this problem," he added.

Ryan stressed that any deal with Democrats to make DACA benefits permanent would have to include border security measures.

"I do believe there's got to be a solution to this problem, but at the same time I think it's only reasonable, it makes perfect common sense, that we deal with the problem that was the root cause of this, which is we do not have operational control of our borders," said Ryan.

Ryan added that a border wall, Trump’s signature campaign issue, should be part of the solution.

Democrats have vowed to do everything in their power to block wall funding.

"I think a wall actually works," said Ryan. "The reason I say that is because I went down to the Rio Grande and the Border Patrol themselves told me that there are certain spaces where we actually need a physical barrier."

He added a wall would not need to cover the entire length of the border.

"There are circumstances on the ground that should dictate how we do border security but doing border security should not be a negotiable thing, we should have security over our borders."

Beyond DACA, Ryan said, the country needs to fix a "broken immigration system."

He warned, however, that a comprehensive immigration bill was unrealistic, and "fall under its own weight."

"I think we just need to make progress in immigration just for the sake of the country. Put aside politics, this is a broken system that needs to be fixed," he said.

"I actually like the idea of moving to a merit-based immigration system for the economy's needs. I think that makes a lot of sense," Ryan continued.

He mentioned the Raise Act, proposed by Republican Sens. Tom Cotton (Ark.) and David Perdue (Ga.), but said he disagreed with its sharp reduction in legal immigration.

"The numbers are what I have an issue with. But the idea of going to a skills-based point system, which a lot of countries do, I think there's a lot of merit to that idea," said Ryan.

Ryan said the economy, with workforce shortages and an aging population, would need an influx of labor to maintain growth.



]Source.
I agree that we simply cannot deport these kids. There has to be a way to allow them to stay here. After that, immigration in toto needs to be addressed. I don't disagree with a skills point system. We should at least discuss whether or not to have some sort of emergency plan for people caught up in internal warfare, etc.

We've got citizens in this country that we need to kick out, but that's another issue.

[sign in to see URL] Congress continues to surprise me. Maybe there's a little hope.
9/13/2017, 1:10 pm Link to this post PM CooterBrown44
 
Miz Robbie Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Head Administrator
Global user

Registered: 08-2017
Posts: 542
Karma: 2 (+2/-0)
Reply | Quote
Re: Quickies


There is a Supreme Court thread and and a DACA thread.

Please look around.

---
Robbie
9/13/2017, 1:15 pm Link to this post PM Miz Robbie
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3 ... 7  8  9  10  11  12  13 



You are not logged in (login)
Back To Top